Cellular One - Click for details!

Council approves referendum on electing judges

By Noel Lyn Smith
Navajo Times

WINDOW ROCK, July 29, 2010

Text size: A A A  email this pageE-mail this story
Share |


Sessions College. Click for enrollment details.
A referendum on the Nov. 2 ballot will ask Navajo voters if district court judges and Supreme Court justices should be elected, rather than appointed as they are now.

Delegate Thomas Walker (Birdsprings/Leupp/Tolani Lake) sponsored the referendum bill, which the council discussed July 21 during the summer session. It passed 60-15.

"People requested this legislation and we will put it out in the general election that is coming up," Walker told the council. "Even though as a council we are empowered to make laws, the people are empowered to as well."

The Judicial Elections Referendum Act of 2010 asks voters to decide if district court judges and the Supreme Court should be elective positions. If voters approve it, the first election of judges would take place in the 2012 election for chapter officials.

Under current law, judges and justices go through a prolonged application process. Successful applicants are appointed to the bench by the president and confirmed by the council, in a process similar to the federal system. They serve for life unless they are removed for a reason or step down voluntarily.

Navajo Election Administration Director Edison Wauneka said Wednesday the referendum would appear on the Nov. 2 ballot.

"Without question, I feel it will be on the ballot," Wauneka said.

The referendum would need a simple majority to pass, unless otherwise specified in the legislation, he said.

According to the law, the council may refer referendum measures to the people.

The law also states that a referendum shall pass if a majority, or other identified amount greater than a majority, of all eligible registered voters who cast a vote, vote for the proposed measure.

The legislation had not been reviewed by President Joe Shirley Jr. as of press time Wednesday.

During the council's discussion last week, Leonard Tsosie (Pueblo Pintado/Torreon/Whitehorse Lake) questioned the motive for changing the existing system. He pointed out that the bill was drafted after the Supreme Court issued its May 28 opinion upholding the Dec. 15, 2009, election to reduce the council and said it could be viewed as retaliation against the court for its decision.






Tsosie, echoing the position on elective judgeships taken by most legal scholars and the American Bar Association, also questioned the ability to get qualified individuals to campaign for positions.

"Having served on the Judiciary Committee, we have a hard time getting judges under the current system," Tsosie said. "What are you going to do if you do not have qualified candidates applying to run?"

He added that the judicial branch has been honored by many organizations and is recognized as the leader among tribal legal systems.

"This will cause our flagship to sink," Tsosie said of the prospect of making the judiciary a political office.

Raymond Maxx (Coalmine Canyon/Tóh Nanees DizĂ­) echoed Tsosie's opinion that the bill was based on retaliation.

"The intent is to get away from politics but actually we're going straight into politics when we elect judges," he said.

In addition to that, Maxx worried that judges would start making decisions based on the amount of votes they can generate.

"Their boss should be the law, instead of the voters," Maxx said.

LoRenzo Bates (Upper Fruitland) and Lorenzo Curley (Houck/Lupton/Nahata Dziil) were concerned with the impact on the tribe's budget.

The legislation proposes salaries at $80,000 per year for judges, $90,000 per year for justices, and $100,000 per year for the chief justice.

"The salaries and costs of running our judicial system will increase," Curley said. "I would like to see how this would translate in terms of increase for the judicial branch budget."

Other parts of the government might have to be cut in order to pay for the additional cost, Curley said.

Bates said he would not support the measure because a budget impact analysis was not attached.

"The people need to know the financial impact on the Navajo Nation aside from everything else in here," he said.

Both Bates and Curley are members of the Budget and Finance Committee.

Kee Allen Begay (Many Farms/Round Rock), Kee Yazzie Mann (K'ai'bii'tó) and Edmund Yazzie (Thoreau) spoke in support of the legislation.

"If we are not happy with the judges' performance, then we'll have the power to do re-elections," Yazzie said.

Mann was critical of the current judicial system, stating in Navajo that the current judges do not respect tradition.

"They say the people are in charge and in control," Mann said. "This is a good way for them to show it."

Begay said the change would help fill positions on the bench.

"Right now, all we are saying is let's put this referendum to the people," Begay said.

Back to top ^

Current Rating:
* * * * * * * 1/2 (7.5 out of 10)
Rated 2 times.
Rate it:

Comment Script

Comment on this

Get educated judges
I did read that if judges are elected they have to be qualified, so next thing to do is up the pay and put a limit on the number of judges. The current judges have been in there for years and years and still have not been fully educated on the laws. The majority of the current judges do not have College degrees, so I don't see any difference in voting in judges. GET RID OF THE CURRENT GROUCHY JUDGES, [personal attack removed], LET'S GET YOUNG EDUCATED PEOPLE IN THERE.
#20 - mutt - 07/29/2010 - 15:16 | Report abuse
He's sooooo smart
TSAILE-Legislation sponsored by NNCouncil Delegate Danny Simpson would enable Navajo people to further become a part of the educational system by electing people to serve on Indian nation's first college. That legislation is supported by Dine College President Ferlin Clark.

LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE committee
#19 - Dr. Ferlin Clark Supporter - 07/29/2010 - 13:56 | Report abuse
Ferlin Clark wants Dine College board to be elected too?
So how is that different? He wants to have people run for the board of Dine College. This resolition just passed the GSC and is in the hands of the GSC now.
#18 - jumboshrimp - 07/29/2010 - 13:07 | Report abuse
Get rid of Judge Leroy Bedonie
Get rid of Judge Leroy Bedonie, that guy does not know how to find himself out of mess if he was given directions. J O to the max and a totally ignorant of the REAL LAW and what justice is all about.

He is a public official and open to speculation and I have every right to express myself about him. It's my 1st Amendment!
#17 - Navajo JUSTICE - 07/29/2010 - 12:53 | Report abuse
No No No
Scary if passed. Frightening to know an opinion would be written by a judge with 8th grade education. Very possible. Keep ii out of the political arena.
#16 - rezzie - 07/29/2010 - 12:52 | Report abuse
Hadaa' inda Dineh ba dajiniido. It should've been for the people starting with the CDs, until they are scrutinized for their spending behaviors (and professionalism), then they say let the people decide, since when have the Council let the people be heard. If its the Council who approve the appointments of Judges, then they should blame themselves for putting these judges in, instead of pointing the fingers at the judges saying they are not qualified. Doo beelt'eeda, shinanit'a'i, maybe its really you the Council, that is not qualified.
#15 - Tempedee' - 07/29/2010 - 10:41 | Report abuse
Send them to Law School
The NN judges think they can do whatever they feel especially threaten people coming before them. Maybe this will teach them a lesson specifically the Benally sisters, Jennifer Benally and Geraldine Benally who act like they own the court or at the chapter house, NO RESPECT. They need to be reminded they are only employees of the NN and what kind of degrees do they have??? I am sorry but these two ladies need to pack up along with Judge Bedonie and send them off to Law School!
#14 - K-Town - 07/29/2010 - 10:28 | Report abuse
shovel please
before we all get carried away, voting for judges is to ensure an independent judiciary. otherwise, like it is now, appointees are appointed with even a review of their resume by those most concerned, such as the local people who get busted for one reason or another and usually don't vote.
but, no matter what navajo nation govt does, its still a structure made by nonNavajo people and represents nonNavajo interests,often against the welfare of navajo people.
#13 - muddy navajo - 07/29/2010 - 10:19 | Report abuse
A move by CD's to maintain status quo and power. Vote no to this non-sense
Another move by the current CD's who will soon be losing their jobs. Their trying desperately to keep a majority of legislative power within the Council. Electing judges is just non-sense. Judges are suppose to interpret established laws not concern themselves with campaigning and making decisions on the current politics of NN presidents, CD's, or voters. This council continues to make a mockery of political science, constitutionality, and government. Then again how many CD's know what that means?
#12 - Dapoleesh - 07/29/2010 - 09:18 | Report abuse
Vote NO
Don't let politics creep into the judicial!! The judicial system is not broken.
#11 - Lilly - 07/29/2010 - 09:11 | Report abuse
Start Previous Page
Name
E-mail (Will not appear online)
Title
Comment
;-) :-) :-D :-( :-o >-( B-) :oops: :-[] :-P
To prevent automated Bots from spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.



TERMS OF USE
By submitting your comment, you agree to the following:
1. No personal attacks on non-public figures.
2. No swearing.
3. No explicit, pornographic, sexual references.
4. No malicious or libelous material. (In other words, be prepared to back up with facts.)
5. Do not write anything that you would be embarrassed to say to a room full of your most respected relatives and friends.


Back to top ^

Text size: A A A  email this pageE-mail this story
Share |


Jack Jackson for State Senate. Click for details.